It has been heavily covered in national news media that property & casualty insurers have been withdrawing from certain business lines, in particular homeowners, in states such as California, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. Other states around the country are also experiencing heightened numbers of insurance carriers exiting some markets. In response states have been addressing different aspects of insurance carrier withdrawal in various ways. For instance, last fall, Connecticut issued a Bulletin which requires property & casualty insurers that discontinue or substantially reduce “writings in a line or subline” to provide prior notice to the state insurance regulator. Earlier this year, Iowa extended the consumer notice period for renewals and non-renewals of personal lines policies from 30 days to 60 days. This spring, the Delaware Department of Insurance (the “Department”) raised the issue of “carriers quietly exiting lines of business” while the New Mexico Office of Superintendent of Insurance (the “OSI”) proposed a regulation which would impose on property & casualty insurers prior notice to OSI when discontinuing products in the state.

On May 24, 2024, the Massachusetts Division of Insurance (the “Division”) issued Insurance Bulletin 2024-06, “inducements, rebates and affiliated entities” (the “Bulletin”). The Bulletin is addressed to “all licensed insurance companies and insurance producers.” The Division issued the Bulletin to “remind insurance companies, officers thereof, and insurance producers authorized to operate in Massachusetts” that Massachusetts law prohibits, as an unfair or deceptive act or practice in connection with the transaction of insurance business, insurance companies, officers, and producers from “paying, giving, or allowing to pay or give, directly or indirectly, ‘anything of value’ or ‘any valuable consideration’, not specified in the insurance contract, as an inducement to the purchase of insurance or a rebate of insurance premium.” The Bulletin further reminds insurance producers that Massachusetts law also prohibits any “special favor or advantage” to accrue to an such producer that is not specified in the policy. Unlawful rebates or inducements are not solely limited to “reductions on insurance premiums”, but rather such rebates or inducements “include payments, reductions or discounts, not specified in the insurance contract, that would bestow anything of value, valuable consideration, special favor or advantage on the insurance producer.”

On May 23, 2024, the New York Department of Financial Services (the “Department”) issued Insurance Circular Letter No. 3 (the “Letter”). The Letter is addressed to “all insurers authorized to write property/casualty insurance in New York State, the New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association [‘NYPIUA’], and rate service organizations.” The purpose of the Letter is to “encourage all insurers authorized to write property/casualty insurance in New York State (‘insurers’) to offer loss mitigation tools and services to insureds for free or a reduced fee…and to encourage insurers, the [NYPIUA], and rate service organizations…to file with the [Department] actuarially appropriate discounts for insureds for the installation of devices or systems that mitigate or prevent losses….” As a result in a rise in the InsurTech space, in 2021 the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) updated the anti-rebating section of the NAIC Model Unfair Trade Practices Act (#880) (Section 4(I)) by excluding various value-added products or services that an insurer or producer may offer at no cost or a reduced fee from the definition of impermissible discrimination or rebates. Other states have also implemented such changes.